» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Xiaomi Poco X7 Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G Nothing Phone (2a) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Motorola Edge 50 Neo DIN A6 ❌
连接性 -Redmi Note 14 5G 配备红外触发器和耳机插孔Redmi Note 14 5G 采用 8 GB LPDDR4X 内存和 256 GB UFS 2.2 存储，这是一个不错的标准。在某些地区，这款智能手机还提供最高 12 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间。
红外触发器、立体声扬声器和 3.5 毫米插孔等功能都超出了这个价位智能手机的常规配置。它的混合 SIM 卡插槽可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡或一张 SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡，最大容量可达 1 TB。
USB-C 端口的运行速度为 USB 2.0，因此没有任何意外。在我们使用三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘进行的复制测试中，它的数据吞吐量达到了 24.1 MB/s。
左：没有连接（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
顶部：3.5 毫米耳机插孔、扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、SIM/microSD 插槽（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
microSD 读卡器在插入 Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD 参考卡后，Redmi Note 14 5G 的 microSD 数据吞吐率没有达到前代产品的水平，但它的传输速率比前代产品更稳定。 三星Galaxy A35 5G.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
55.32 MB/s +84%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080 (Angelbird AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60)
36.2 MB/s +20%Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=69, last 2 years)
32.4 MB/s +8%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
30.1 MB/s
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38 (29.1-47.4) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.8 (25.4-57.9) Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.7 (43.2-79.3) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (38.1-99.5)
软件 -Redmi Note 14 5G 仅有 2 项操作系统升级小米交付的Redmi Note 14 5G 搭载了基于Android 14 的 HyperOS 1.0，制造商的目标是在 2029 年 1 月之前为其提供Android 安全更新。在 2 月底进行测试时，其最新的Android 安全补丁是从 2025 年 1 月 1 日开始的。
据称，小米只想为其 2 个操作系统升级Redmi Note 14 5G。有趣的是，它似乎给 Redmi Note 14 LTE最便宜的红米机型的支持直到 2031 年 3 月才结束。这里还计划进行 4 次操作系统升级。
除了谷歌和小米的应用程序，HyperOS 还包括一些第三方供应商提供的臃肿软件，如 TikTok、Facebook 和 Booking。不过，所有这些程序都可以轻松卸载。
可持续性关于Redmi Note 14 5G 的二氧化碳排放量，小米尚未提供任何信息。不过，该设备的包装几乎不使用塑料，而且制造商承诺其智能手机的使用寿命很长。
一方面，这是通过吸能泡沫和内部四角加固等保护措施实现的，以防止手机跌落损坏。其次，据小米公司称，即使在使用四年或 1600 次充电后，其电池仍能保持初始容量的 80% 以上。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和 GPS 适合日常使用Redmi Note 14 5G 的 WiFi 5 模块没有打破任何速度记录。不过，当连接到华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时，数据传输非常稳定，峰值约为 370 MBit/s。竞争对手如 三星Galaxy A35 5G和 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Neo等竞争对手的产品表明，即使在这个价格范围内，您也可以期待更快的 Wi-Fi 网速。
在通信技术方面，Redmi Note 14 5G 配备了 NFC 模块和 5G 模块，领先于其更便宜的姐妹机型 Redmi Note 14 LTE.它能识别 DACH 地区（本次测试所在地）所有重要的 5G 频段，如频段 1、3、28、77 和 78。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000Samsung Galaxy A35 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
834 (780min - 913max) MBit/s +124%Motorola Edge 50 Neo802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
762 (640min - 836max) MBit/s +104%Average of class Smartphone (49.8 - 1828, n=180, last 2 years)
707 MBit/s +90%Nothing Phone (2a)802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (417min - 860max) MBit/s +82%Xiaomi Poco X7802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
398 (193min - 410max) MBit/s +7%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
373 (183min - 385max) MBit/s Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
355 (299min - 364max) MBit/s -5%Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (10.5 - 718, n=224)
339 MBit/s -9% iperf3 receive AXE11000Motorola Edge 50 Neo802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
939 (843min - 960max) MBit/s +168%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (758min - 851max) MBit/s +136%Nothing Phone (2a)802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
782 (633min - 873max) MBit/s +123%Average of class Smartphone (52 - 1857, n=180, last 2 years)
734 MBit/s +109%Xiaomi Poco X7802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
377 (187min - 380max) MBit/s +7%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (361min - 375max) MBit/s +5%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
351 (340min - 366max) MBit/s Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (20.1 - 695, n=223)
329 MBit/s -6% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzAverage of class Smartphone (508 - 1945, n=96, last 2 years)
1327 MBit/s Nothing Phone (2a)802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
872 (464min - 957max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzAverage of class Smartphone (451 - 1870, n=96, last 2 years)
1390 MBit/s Nothing Phone (2a)802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
914 (902min - 925max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (183-385) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (780-913) Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (340-366) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (758-851)
室内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收Redmi Note 14 5G 支持所有常见的卫星导航服务，但仅限于单频模式。因此，在一次 4 公里的步行中，小米手机并没有像 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表那样准确地标出所覆盖的路线，有时它的定位明显偏离了理想路线。尽管如此，导航功能在日常生活中通常还是没问题的。
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：池塘
GPS 测试：路线电话功能和通话质量 -Redmi Note 14 5G 不支持 eSIM 卡Redmi Note 14 5G 使用谷歌的标准应用程序拨打电话，通话质量不错。有时，电话另一端的人听起来有点刺耳，而且环境噪音并不总是能得到有效抑制。不过，我们在测试通话过程中没有发现噪音或掉线现象。
VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话可以在手机设置中激活，但不能激活 eSIM。
摄像头 - 10800 万像素三摄像头和 OIS使用自拍相机拍摄的照片（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）Redmi Note 14 5G 的摄像头设置与前代产品几乎没有区别。与 Redmi Note 13 5G一样，它配备了一个 10800 万像素的主摄像头（图像传感器为三星 ISOCELL HM6）和一个 800 万像素的超广角摄像头（图像传感器为 Omnivision OV08）。上一代产品的深度传感器现在被分辨率为 200 万像素的微距摄像头所取代。
手机的自拍摄像头也从 1600 万像素提高到 2000 万像素。这使得Redmi Note 14 5G 能够拍摄出不错的照片，准确捕捉更精细的图像细节，并相对真实地再现肤色。这在人像模式下也能可靠地工作。
它的主摄像头在日光下也能拍摄出不错的照片，色彩鲜艳，细节清晰。不过，动态范围明显不足，相机软件有时对物体边缘的描绘过于锐利。如果使用数码变焦，图像质量会明显下降。使用预设的 3 倍放大率时，图像有时会显得模糊，通常只能描绘出淡淡的颜色。
在其他摄像头方面，小米手机的表现也不过是这个价位的标准水平。它的超广角拍摄效果并不出众，但尽管色彩饱和度低、细节不丰富，在白天拍摄简单的快照还是完全没问题的。而微距镜头则是主摄像头和数码变焦无法做到的。
由于配备了 OIS 防抖动主摄像头，Redmi Note 14 5G 可以录制高质量的视频。在拍摄时，无法在主摄像头和超广角摄像头之间切换。两个摄像头都能以最高 1080p 30fps 的速度工作。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photoclick to load imagesXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GCanon EOS 90DApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxHonor Magic7 Pro0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GCanon EOS 90DApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxHonor Magic7 Pro0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GCanon EOS 90DApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxHonor Magic7 Pro0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GCanon EOS 90DApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxHonor Magic7 Pro0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GCanon EOS 90DApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxHonor Magic7 Pro0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
在我们的测试实验室中，即使在最佳光线下，手机主摄像头有时也难以准确捕捉色彩。与 ColorChecker 测试图中的参考色相比，绿色调和灰色的暗色调存在很大偏差。在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下，先前清晰的测试图表和 ColorChecker 图表只能部分识别。
5.7 ∆E5.6 ∆E1.9 ∆E17 ∆E5.8 ∆E1 ∆E8.3 ∆E2.5 ∆E11 ∆E8.7 ∆E6.5 ∆E8 ∆E3.9 ∆E11.2 ∆E7.2 ∆E8.7 ∆E8.7 ∆E4.4 ∆E5.7 ∆E5.9 ∆E7 ∆E9.3 ∆E11 ∆E6.5 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G: 7.15 ∆E min: 1.01 - max: 17.01 ∆E30.4 ∆E54.9 ∆E39.8 ∆E34.1 ∆E45.9 ∆E61.5 ∆E53 ∆E34.8 ∆E43.6 ∆E29.4 ∆E64.5 ∆E63.9 ∆E31.5 ∆E47.1 ∆E37.1 ∆E76.4 ∆E44.3 ∆E41.6 ∆E92.9 ∆E71 ∆E52.5 ∆E37 ∆E23.9 ∆E13.9 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G: 46.88 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.94 ∆E
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
配件和保修 - 电源需额外付费Redmi Note 14 5G 的欧盟供货范围包括一条 USB-C 连接线、一个 SIM 卡工具、一个保护盖和两份宣传页，其中包括快速入门指南以及安全和保修信息。您需要自行解决配套的 45 瓦电源。
小米在线商店提供电源适配器、移动电源和耳机等配件。Redmi Note 14 5G 还可以购买小米关怀保险。保险期限为 2 年，仅承保意外损坏或盗窃。
Redmi Note 14 5G 在欧盟地区的保修期为 12 个月。
输入设备和操作 -Redmi Note 14 5G 配备指纹传感器Redmi Note 14 5G 启动后对输入的反应迟缓，不能立即加载应用程序。不过，如果你耐心等待几秒钟，一切都会非常流畅。
小米手机对触摸屏上的输入反应迅速而准确。其振动电机的触觉反馈可设置为三个级别，最低级别在输入文字时几乎感觉不到。
手机的指纹传感器位于显示屏下方，可确保生物识别身份验证。它能快速识别手指，即使关闭屏幕也能正常工作。智能手机还可以选择使用安全性较低的 2D 面部识别技术解锁。
直立式键盘
水平键盘
显示屏：明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 面板，带 PWM 调光功能子像素Redmi Note 14 5G 的 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏分辨率为 2,400 × 1,080 像素，触摸采样率为 240 Hz。根据显示的内容，屏幕会在 60、90 和 120 Hz 之间自动切换。如果您不希望这样，也可以将显示屏设置为 60 或 120 Hz 的固定刷新率。支持 HDR10、HDR10+ 和 HLG。
小米标称其屏幕亮度为 1,200 cd/m²，这是一个符合实际的数字。在测试过程中，我们测得的平均亮度为 1,146 cd/m²，最高亮度为 1,169 cd/m²。在显示 HDR 时，面板亮度增加到 2,078 cd/m²，再次非常接近制造商的规格（2,100 cd/m²）。关闭亮度传感器后，显示屏的最高亮度为 466 cd/m²。
用户可以在显示设置中选择 "始终开启 "功能。不过，屏幕只能保持 10 秒钟的激活状态，而且必须事先轻触屏幕。
在我们测量的所有亮度下，AMOLED 显示屏都会以 60 Hz 的频率闪烁。但与此同时，为了减轻脉宽调制对敏感用户的负面影响，我们采用了高达 952 Hz 的 PWM 调光频率（制造商的规格为 980 Hz）。
1125cd/m²1135cd/m²1149cd/m²1127cd/m²1147cd/m²1167cd/m²1137cd/m²1158cd/m²1169cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1169 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1146 cd/m² Minimum: 2.38 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 96 %Center on Battery: 1147 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.27CCT: 6368 K
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GAMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"Motorola Edge 50 NeoP-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4"Nothing Phone (2a)AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSuper AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"Xiaomi Poco X7AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GAMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"Screen1%10%-7%13%6%Brightness middle (cd/m²)11471246 9%1033 -10%904 -21%1156 1%958 -16%Brightness (cd/m²)11461235 8%1042 -9%912 -20%1150 0%965 -16%Brightness Distribution (%)9698 2%96 0%97 1%98 2%83 -14%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.61.8 -13%1.6 -0%2.1 -31%1.1 31%1.43 11%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.73.81 -3%2.5 32%2.8 24%3.1 16%2.51 32%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.32.3 -0%1.2 48%2.2 4%1.6 30%1.4 39%Gamma2.27 97%2.191 100%2.07 106%2.1 105%2.22 99%2.33 94%CCT6368 102%6488 100%6482 100%6478 100%6304 103%6476 100%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 HzAmplitude: 14.42 %Secondary Frequency: 952 HzThe display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8121 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25 %
50 %
75 %
100 %固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。
该设备的显示屏可以非常准确地显示色彩。当我们将图像模式从预设的 "鲜艳"改为 "标准"时，它的表现最为出色。由于 Delta-E 值小于 3，它的色彩和灰度显示以及色温（6368 K）都处于最佳范围。
色彩精确度（图像模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（图像模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（图像模式 "标准"、色温 "标准"、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（图像模式 "标准"、色温 "标准"、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.985 ms rise↘ 0.819 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.858 ms rise↘ 0.8035 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).
Redmi Note 14 5G 适合在户外使用。不过，其 AMOLED 显示屏的亮度不够，在阳光直射下无法始终清晰显示屏幕内容，这在夏天可能尤其是个问题。即便如此，您通常只需稍微改变一下握持手机的角度，就能获得良好的可读性。
户外使用（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
户外使用（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）视角（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）性能 -Redmi Note 14 5G 配备联发科 Dimensity 7025小米目前的红米智能手机几乎全部采用联发科处理器，只有 Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G的 骁龙 7s 第 3 代.相比之下，Redmi Note 14 5G 则采用了 联发科 Dimensity 7025速度略快于 联发科 Dimensity 6080略快。
Redmi Note 14 5G 在我们测试的对比设备中表现不错，但在性能方面仅排在第三位。不过，这在日常使用中并不重要，因为小米手机运行流畅，只有在处理要求较高的应用程序时才会达到极限。
Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=212, last 2 years)
1754 Points +85%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points +19%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1051 Points +11%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1030 Points +9%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points +7%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (947 - 1013, n=4)
980 Points +3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
947 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
769 Points -19% Multi-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=212, last 2 years)
5119 Points +122%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2977 Points +29%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2908 Points +26%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points +26%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points +13%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (2249 - 2370, n=4)
2305 Points 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2302 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1991 Points -14%Geekbench 5.5
Single-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (145 - 2635, n=128, last 2 years)
1238 Points +68%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
890 Points +20%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
783 Points +6%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (739 - 773, n=3)
758 Points +3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
739 Points Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
726 Points -2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
593 Points -20% Multi-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (550 - 9512, n=128, last 2 years)
4261 Points +103%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2778 Points +32%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2741 Points +31%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2177 Points +4%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (2005 - 2199, n=3)
2101 Points 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2100 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1943 Points -7%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=152, last 2 years)
1487579 Points +217%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points +48%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
665983 Points +42%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points +28%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (469182 - 500994, n=2)
485088 Points +3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
469182 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
400029 Points -15%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 50 NeoMediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
15116 Points +42%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=188, last 2 years)
14853 Points +40%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points +26%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
13406 Points +26%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (10629 - 13548, n=3)
11770 Points +11%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points +3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
10629 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10567 Points -1%CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=126, last 2 years)
1143 Points +95%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
759 Points +30%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
695 Points +19%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points +11%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
601 Points +3%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (582 - 597, n=3)
588 Points +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
585 Points BaseMark OS II
OverallAverage of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=148, last 2 years)
7682 Points +109%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4725 Points +28%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points +20%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points +12%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (3678 - 3875, n=2)
3777 Points +3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3678 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3073 Points -16% SystemAverage of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=148, last 2 years)
11440 Points +61%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +24%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8774 Points +24%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (7104 - 7621, n=2)
7363 Points +4%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7104 Points Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points -5%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6085 Points -14% MemoryAverage of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=148, last 2 years)
8710 Points +84%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (4735 - 5276, n=2)
5006 Points +6%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4735 Points Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4732 Points 0%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points -9%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3929 Points -17% GraphicsAverage of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)
25884 Points +538%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points +162%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8570 Points +111%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points +73%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (4058 - 4087, n=2)
4073 Points 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4058 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3050 Points -25% WebAverage of class Smartphone (858 - 2468, n=148, last 2 years)
1703 Points +27%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points +6%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1401 Points +4%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (1341 - 1367, n=2)
1354 Points +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1341 Points Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1224 Points -9%Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -35%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Nothing Phone (2a)MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points +343%Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=137, last 2 years)
19755 Points +232%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9243 Points +55%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8359 Points +41%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (5946 - 6394, n=2)
6170 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5946 Points AI Benchmark
Score V5Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=42, last 2 years)
829 Points +1132%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
88.8 Points +32%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
74.6 Points +11%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
67.3 Points Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (n=1)
67.3 Points 0% Score V6Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22149, n=74, last 2 years)
4724 Points +2128%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (212 - 267, n=2)
240 Points +13%Xiaomi Poco X7MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
234 Points +10%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
213 Points 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
212 Points
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 7025使用 Imagination IMG BXM-8-256作为图形处理器，它与 SoC 一样，在性能方面可被归类为中端机型。不过，在我们的测试中，与竞争对手相比，它的排名略低于平均水平。由于不兼容 Vulkan，大多数 3DMark 测试都无法在智能手机上运行。
3DMark: 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5641 Points +64%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5448 Points +59%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4391 Points +28%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4006 Points +17%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3873 Points +13%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3437 Points 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6935 Points +205%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5220 Points +129%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5218 Points +129%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5118 Points +125%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2615 Points +15%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2277 Points 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5966 Points +142%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5308 Points +116%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5267 Points +114%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4936 Points +100%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2818 Points +14%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2462 Points GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +65%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps +51%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +5%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps 0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps +121%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps +64%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps +60%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps -4%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +45%Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +28%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +28%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -23%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +58%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +31%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +27%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -31%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +97%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +62%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps +34%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -17%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +97%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +65%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +53%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -21%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +127%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +67%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +53%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -13%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +135%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +94%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +76%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -6%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +230%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +100%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps +80%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +70%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps -11%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +213%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +124%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +109%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +94%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.7 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -12%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +167%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +67%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps +61%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +56%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -28%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +165%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +100%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps +90%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +70%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -25%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +236%Xiaomi Poco X7Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps +132%Motorola Edge 50 NeoMali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.2 fps +121%Samsung Galaxy A35 5GMali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps +107%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GIMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.8 fps Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps -11%
Redmi Note 14 5G 在浏览器基准测试中一直表现出色，在同类产品中具有典型性能。前代机型 Redmi Note 13 5G-在某些情况下速度明显较慢。
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=153, last 2 years)
155.7 Points +40%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points +4%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
111.073 Points Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (108.8 - 111.2, n=3)
110.4 Points -1%Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
87.225 Points -21%Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -31%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
71.171 Points -36%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=128, last 2 years)
227 runs/min +112%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (107 - 112, n=2)
109.5 runs/min +2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
107 runs/min Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
107 runs/min 0%Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min -3%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min -3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
72 runs/min -33%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=125, last 2 years)
14.5 runs/min +114%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (6.79 - 7.45, n=2)
7.12 runs/min +5%Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
6.88 runs/min +1%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
6.79 runs/min Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
6.62 runs/min -3%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min -14%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
4.27 runs/min -37%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years)
147.3 Points +32%Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points +12%Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points +10%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
112 Points Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (107 - 112, n=2)
109.5 Points -2%Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
100 Points -11%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
82 Points -27%Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=200, last 2 years)
49133 Points +35%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
36371 Points Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points -1%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (34723 - 36734, n=3)
35943 Points -1%Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
31245 Points -14%Motorola Edge 50 Neo
23567 Points -35%Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
22145 Points -39%Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -49%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
2014.2 ms * -78%Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * -39%Xiaomi Poco X7
1312.2 ms * -16%Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years)
1149 ms * -2%Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (1131 - 1132, n=2)
1131 ms * -0%Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
1130.9 ms * Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * +3%* ... smaller is better
得益于 UFS 2.2 闪存，Redmi Note 14 5G 的性能与竞争对手不相上下，应用程序和游戏的加载时间也相对较短。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMotorola Edge 50 NeoNothing Phone (2a)Samsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Poco X7Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-529%15%-47%-13%-11%-6%79% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)950.621023 8%1028.37 8%529.32 -44%947.4 0%951.97 0%903 ?(482 - 1041, n=54) -5%2223 ?(270 - 4370, n=195, last 2 years) 134% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)792.56964.6 22%952 20%270 -66%915.23 15%503.79 -36%727 ?(369 - 943, n=54) -8%1838 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=195, last 2 years) 132% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)257.91331 28%273.19 6%244.24 -5%100.16 -61%243.8 -5%226 ?(99.7 - 295, n=54) -12%295 ?(47.6 - 576, n=195, last 2 years) 14% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)245.16384.1 57%311.8 27%62.59 -74%226.88 -7%240.36 -2%247 ?(99.2 - 390, n=54) 1%335 ?(9.4 - 964, n=195, last 2 years) 37%
游戏 - 远未达到 120fps联发科 联发科 Dimensity 7025's Imagination GPU IMG-BXM8-256大多数情况下，只要不把细节设置得太高，我们选择的一小部分当前游戏都能流畅运行。
在最大可选图形设置下，《Asphalt 9》和《PUBG Mobile》几乎总能超过 30fps。另一方面，《源氏冲击》对于智能手机来说实在是太大了。游戏在最低细节级别下仍能流畅运行，但在最高细节级别下就变得生涩了。
我们使用Gamebench测试工具测量了游戏帧率。
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 24.4.0h: Ø59 (34-61) Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 24.4.0h: Ø58.4 (27-61) Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø38.2 (15-51) Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø24.7 (8-31) Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø40 (39-41) Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.6.0: Ø29.8 (18-31)
废气排放 - 智能手机冷却不节流温度GFXBench 电池测试 T-RexRedmi Note 14 5G 即使在极端负荷下也能保持冷静。正如 GFXBench 的 T-Rex 压力测试所显示的那样，这款智能手机几乎在任何时候都能充分发挥其性能。我们通常通过 3DMark 压力测试来检查可能出现的节流现象，但由于 Vulkan 不兼容，Redmi Note 14 5G 无法运行这些测试。
Max. LoadIdle
39.9 °C38.7 °C34.5 °C 39.7 °C37.3 °C34.1 °C 36 °C38.7 °C33.2 °C
Maximum: 39.9 °CAverage: 36.9 °C
34.2 °C36.2 °C38.6 °C32.3 °C35.5 °C38 °C31.5 °C33.9 °C35.5 °C
Maximum: 38.6 °CAverage: 35.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 29.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
26.8 °C26.7 °C27.9 °C 26.7 °C27 °C27.6 °C 26.6 °C26.7 °C27.1 °C
Maximum: 27.9 °CAverage: 27 °C
25.9 °C26.3 °C26.2 °C25.9 °C26.1 °C26 °C26.1 °C26.2 °C26.1 °C
Maximum: 26.3 °CAverage: 26.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 24.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
发言人Redmi Note 14 5G 配备了立体声扬声器。虽然它们明显缺乏低音，但却能相当线性地再现中高音。小巧的音膜能很好地传递声音。但在播放音乐时，声音缺乏深度。
为了获得更好的声音体验，我们建议将外置扬声器或耳机连接到智能手机上，可以通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙 5.3 连接。它支持多种蓝牙编解码器，如 AAC、LDAC 以及各种 aptX 和 LHDC 变体。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 67% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)Compared to same class» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 尽管电池容量为 5110 毫安时，但续航能力一般耗电量尽管 联发科 Dimensity 7025Redmi Note 14 5G 的运算能力适中，但它并不是同类智能手机中最省钱的一款。不过，总体而言，它比 Nothing Phone (2a)和 三星Galaxy A35 5G.
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.07 / 0.2 WattIdle 1.15 / 1.55 / 1.57 Watt
Load
3.87 / 7.66 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G5110 mAhNothing Phone (2a)5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A35 5G5000 mAhXiaomi Poco X75110 mAhXiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G5000 mAhAverage MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-8%-24%8%18%5%-20%Idle Minimum * (Watt)1.150.81 30%0.89 23%1.09 5%1.2 -4%1.145 ?(1.14 - 1.15, n=2) -0%0.848 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=164, last 2 years) 26%Idle Average * (Watt)1.552.01 -30%1.99 -28%1.28 17%0.88 43%1.425 ?(1.3 - 1.55, n=2) 8%1.435 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=164, last 2 years) 7%Idle Maximum * (Watt)1.572.07 -32%2.14 -36%1.31 17%0.96 39%1.455 ?(1.34 - 1.57, n=2) 7%1.621 ?(0.77 - 4.46, n=164, last 2 years) -3%Load Average * (Watt)3.874.16 -7%4.57 -18%3.25 16%2.79 28%3.42 ?(2.96 - 3.87, n=2) 12%6.99 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=141, last 2 years) -81%Load Maximum * (Watt)7.667.91 -3%12.31 -61%8.62 -13%8.82 -15%7.92 ?(7.66 - 8.18, n=2) -3%11.3 ?(3.53 - 22, n=141, last 2 years) -48%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.33 (1.051-6.28) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (1.191-10.8) Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.91 (2.67-3.6) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (3.89-5.98) Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383) Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
运行时间Redmi Note 14 5G 的 5,110 毫安时电池耗电相对较快。在我们的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款智能手机运行了约 13 个小时，而连续循环播放视频则持续了近 17 个小时。除了 Redmi Note 13 5G之外，其他竞争产品的续航时间都大大超出了我们的预期。
在测试过程中，我们使用了小米提供的 45 瓦电源适配器。一个完整的充电周期需要 70 分钟。如果只想充到 80%，则需要等待 55 分钟。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
30h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 01min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G5110 mAhMotorola Edge 50 Neo4310 mAhNothing Phone (2a)5000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A35 5G5000 mAhXiaomi Poco X75110 mAhXiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G5000 mAhBattery runtime6%25%18%36%-17%Reader / Idle (h)3042 40%43.3 44%19.3 -36%H.264 (h)1725.2 48%23.4 38%14.5 -15%WiFi v1.3 (h)12.913.7 6%16.9 31%15 16%17.5 36%13.4 4%Load (h)64.9 -18%4.4 -27%4.7 -22%
Notebookcheck 总评分在我们的测试中，小米Redmi Note 14 5G 以其丰富的功能和相对较低的价格获得了分数。不过，这款入门级手机如果能获得更长时间的软件支持，将会更有优势。
Back to the verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
- 02/28/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero
Chassis87%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device89%
Connectivity44 / 69 → 64%
Weight89%
Battery89%
Display90%
Games Performance7 / 55 → 13%
Application Performance59 / 85 → 69%
AI Performance11%
Temperature91%
Noise100%
Audio78 / 90 → 87%
Camera64%
Average60%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging50%Power Use96.5%Repairability40%Software Updates66.3% Total Sustainability Score: 42.1%
More articles related to this deviceXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Redmi Note 14 Series)News•稳定版 HyperOS 3 开始在Redmi Note 14 和小米手环 10 上发布 |News•稳定版 HyperOS 3 推广范围扩大到三款新的红米和 Poco 手机 |News•小米开始为Redmi Note 14 系列推出 HyperOS 3，从 Pro Plus 5G 开始 |Review•小米Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 智能手机评测--这已经是 Pro 吗？ |Review•小米Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 评测--配备 200 万像素摄像头的中端重磅机型 |Review•Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 评测--面向低价购物者的功能型智能手机 |Review•小米Redmi Note 14 LTE 智能手机评测--更强的动力和耐力
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 463 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 671858 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!